Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

, Research Paper

Selling More Than Merely A Merchandise

Ads for assorted merchandises are seen everyplace a individual looks? on hoardings, in magazines, on telecasting, and countless other topographic points. What draws the consumer into the advertizement? the existent merchandise, the show of the animal adult female as she drinks a glass of milk, or the muscular adult male featuring a Ralph Lauren cover as a breechcloth? These types of advertizements display improbable word pictures of work forces and adult females to society. Today, advertizers use the influence of gender and sex to sell assorted merchandises to consumers, ensuing in unrealistic outlooks of work forces and adult females to society.

Harmonizing to Vernon Fryburger, writer of the book The New Age of Advertising, ? The most of import occupation for advertisement is to? do a sale? for a merchandise or a service, and to make so it must clearly set up a resonance with its audience, which means that it must consciously remain within comparatively narrow bounds of acceptableness in footings of linguistic communication, visual images, and general background and frame of mention? ( 15 ) . Advertisers use many different schemes to sell their merchandises to consumers. They spend over 200 billion dollars per twelvemonth trying to acquire the attending of consumers and to act upon their determinations. An mean individual positions 250 advertizements every twenty-four hours and over two million advertizements by the clip they are 25 old ages of age ( Baran 278 ) . When advertizers are working on runs, they think about what the consumer wants and needs to see in order to buy the merchandise. More frequently than non, attractive, seductive-looking persons are chosen for ads ( Percy and Rossiter 1-5 ) . When advertizers are fixing ad runs, they will normally discourse adult females and work forces can be

Liechty 2

productively pictured ( Goffman 25 ) . An illustration of how advertizers show how adult females can be productively pictured can be seen in many Guess? advertizements. Guess? has published advertizements connoting that misss can utilize their gender to liberate themselves from parental restraints ( Moog 156 ) .

Versace is yet another illustration of how gender and sexual-orientated ads are used to sell their merchandises. In a recent advertizement for Versace Blue Jeans Cologne, a bare male is seen in a waterfall-type scene. Curiously, this advertizement is selling Cologne, but the focal point is on the portraiture of the bare male organic structure in the advertizement, non the Cologne aroma. Numerous ads show one thing, but mean something wholly different. Another illustration of this is from a Seagram? s ad where an attractive adult female is seen dancing with a adult male. The ad says, ? Seagram? s 7 gets things stirring. ? The twosome International Relations and Security Network? T truly express joying and transporting on, as seen in the ad itself ; they merely look similar images of shop manikins alternatively of existent people ( Moog 60 ) . The Seagram? s ad communicates the message that by imbibing this peculiar intoxicant, attractive people will be drawn to you, which will ensue in that individual holding the clip of their life.

Most advertizers feel that by utilizing sexually orientated or seductive ads, the merchandise will be sold much quicker. When consumers see these portraitures of work forces and adult females along the street, gazing down at them from hoardings, or on the telecasting screen, consumers desire to be like the person in the ads, because this will convey felicity into one? s life, success, sex, and much more by featuring a peculiar name trade name of vesture, have oning a new aroma or Cologne and such. ? By giving consumers an attractive image of the merchandises available to them, publicizing motivates them to purchase, ? stated Courtland Bovee and William Arens in a survey conducted for ad aims and ad planning, in add-on to consumer behaviours ( 11 ) . Another thought that consumers grasp is that by utilizing a peculiar merchandise that promotes dieting, cosmetics, vesture, etc. , the consumer will go like the people in the advertizement themselves and so much more if they

Liechty 3

usage this merchandise, which is wholly false. Consumers feel that if they do non utilize this? inquire? merchandise, they will be everlastingly ugly, out of manner, or fat.

Much has occurred since the 1970? s epoch. Today, advertizers break all of these? comparatively narrow bounds, ? mentioned by Vernon Fryburger, by seting risqu? linguistic communication into the ads themselves, questionable frames of mention and visual images, and sometimes level out gross outing portraitures of work forces and adult females. After the Woodstock coevals, ad bureaus across the state were in a universe of injury. The bureaus came to the realisation that what they needed was a new selling technique, which was image transmutation ( Meyers 14 ) .

Image transmutations of genders are non merely seen throughout ads in print, but besides in ads on telecasting. Gender representations throughout primetime are dissimilar from those of either daylight or weekends. Throughout primetime, females are more likely to be revealed in ranks of power and in locations absent from the family as opposed to the daylight. Males, on the contrary, are more likely to be represented as a male parent figure or partner and in household units throughout primetime than they were on weekend sections. Primetime can accordingly be signified as the? marked? category, because it does non overdrive typecasts, which are when characters are cast in functions that require features similar to those already possessed by the performing artist. Surely the primetime ads in this illustration were established to typify a more fashionable and indifferent word picture of gender. Ads are non randomly straw all over the broadcast section, but differ along with the age, sex, and societal state of affairs of the viewing audiences the booster is likely to link with ( Griffiths 1-3 ) .

The standard American citizen will blow over one twelvemonth of his life merely watching telecasting commercials entirely. Americans are invariably seeing a overplus of advertizements throughout each twenty-four hours that they become a day-to-day modus operandi, ensuing in the ads going? invisible. ? So many persons merely come to the realisation of advertisement when it offends them in some

Liechty 4

manner ( Baran 290 ) . Several people find advertisement in some ways offensive to their spiritual beliefs, rules, or political sentiments. Others find the usage of advertisement techniques today, that emphasize sex, force, or organic structure maps, to be in hapless signifier ( Bovee and Arens 49 ) . However, by utilizing these techniques, advertizers know that the merchandise that is socially unacceptable by some will be engraved in the heads of teens and grownups because of the splash it caused these persons. Acerate leaf to state, by seeing these controversial ads, the merchandise will non shortly be forgotten by society.

After consumers purchase this merchandise that is supposed to do them gorgeous, more attractive, sexy, or skinny? overnight, ? they become saddened when they realize that it hasn? T worked or hasn? T made them experience better about themselves. Peoples buy the merchandises because of what they view on the streets, in magazines, on hoardings, or on telecasting because they desire to experience and look like the individual in the ad ; happy, in love, loved by person, sexy, etc. As a consequence of this empty feeling consumers have after they have been unsuccessful with the merchandise, some have committed self-destruction because of their feelings of insignificance or fallen deep into depression. Critics argue that the consumer civilization, which is defined as being a civilization in which personal worth and individuality reside non in ourselves but in the merchandises we surround ourselves with, degrades the individuals who reside in it. A frequent advertisement maneuver for bestiring desire and meaning action is to imply that we are deficient and should non be pleased with ourselves as we are. We, as a society, are either excessively fat or excessively thin, our hair calls for a new expression, our apparels are out of manner, and our spouses wear? T respect us adequate. The lone logical account is that personal betterment is merely a mere purchase off ( Baran 296 ) . In her book, Are They Selling Her Lips? Ad and Identity, Dr. Carol Moog states that? consumers buy the merchandise unconsciously trusting that they will win the esteem they covet, but since they? rhenium still seeking to mensurate up to person else? s outlooks, they feel merely every bit empty as of all time on the

Liechty 5 & lt ;

/p >

indoors? ( 160 ) . Basically, consumers no longer react to mass-market entreaties ; they have more single gustatory sensations and are seeking for a more single manner. In a nutshell, consumers seek merchandises to carry through their emotional and even some physical demands ( Kahle and Chiagouris 237 ) .

Often times consumers? emotional demands are non to the full met after they have purchased this? astonishing? merchandise they had to hold so severely. If it does make full their emotional demands, it merely lasts for a short period of clip and shortly wears off, go forthing the consumer experiencing emptier than before they purchased the merchandise. Advertisers have frequently associated their merchandises with gender, which locks into people? s deepest frights of being detested. They offer these merchandises and images as some kind of ticket to love, when in actuality advertizers are merely giving more frontages for consumers to conceal behind ( Moog 146 ) .

Approximately two old ages ago, the Wall Street Journal declared that in advertisement, sex was? old chapeau, ? intending that sex was non used really frequently, substituted, in this period of AIDS and Women Who Love Too Much, by? the new primness? ( Ellis 2 ) . So what precisely is this? new primness? that was discussed in the Wall Street Journal? It is new methods used by advertizers to stagger in the consumer to purchase their merchandises. But the Wall Street Journal said that advertizers wear? T usage sex near every bit much as they used to. In this twenty-four hours in age, sex sells and it sells rather good. An illustration of how sex is still used today to sell merchandises is seen in a Hewlett-Packard ad, a company known for their merchandising of computing machines and computing machine accoutrements. In this peculiar ad, a adult male in his drawerss is seated in a chair in forepart of a desk, keeping a booklet that he put together for the company. The motto for this ad provinces, ? In a little concern, it? s merely you and your work. ? The inquiry that remains is what does this cat in his underclothes have to make with computing machines or pressmans? Absolutely nil. Another illustration of how sex is used to sell is in assorted Calvin Klein ads. In his ads, adult females are seen lying naked on the beach in seductive

Liechty 6

airss, as a adult male is seen to the full clothed on the side of the ad. This ad is portraying that the adult females are waiting for the work forces to come and take advantage of them on the beach because they are have oning this incredible aroma by Calvin Klein. How can a bare adult female on the beach have anything to make with a aroma? If anything, the H2O has already washed it off of her.

Sexual activity has been used to sell merchandises for old ages? this method of gross revenues is non a new thought amongst advertizers today. In fact, about 40 old ages ago, an ad run was launched for the Maidenform bandeau. This run ran for 20 old ages and consisted of many adult females of many professions moving out their? phantasies? or mundane undertakings in their bandeaus. These peculiar ads conveyed adult females? woolgathering? about being exhibitionistic in organic structure and in their abilities ( Moog 22 ) .

When this ad and ads similar to this were published, women’s rightists began to talk up aloud and proudly. In 1963, Betty Friedan, writer of the ill-famed book, The Feminine Mystique, discussed in her book about the American advertisement industry and how it manipulated the portraiture of adult females. She besides charged the advertisement industry with perpetuating and working the subjugation of adult females through the usage of negative stereotypes. Friedan and her followings argued that these ads were clear and touchable grounds of a sexist society. The ads were everyplace and functioned as a frequent public reminder of the resistances of females ( Craig 3 ) . After legion advertisement bureaus heard these accusals, they became highly defensive to the charges made by Friedan and her buddies. However, ? advertizers began to detect this turning moving ridge of feminist expostulations and major attempts were made to estimate merely how influential their thoughts were going? ( Craig 3-4 ) . As a consequence of her book and its charges towards the advertisement industry, the adult females? s motion grew and finally led to an full-scale run of political action against advertizers in the 1970? s ( Craig 1 ) .

Countless judges say that a big sum of advertisement is per se deceptive in that it wholly and sometimes overtly assures to heighten people? s lives through the

Liechty 7

outgo of a patron? s merchandises. Ad warrants wellness, long life, sexual success, fiscal success, company, popularity, and credence ( Baran 291-92 ) .

In our civilization, we value beauty, kindness, prestigiousness, household, love, and success. As worlds, we must hold nutrient, shelter, and rather candidly, sex. Advertisers know this and take advantage of the demands they know worlds must hold to last ( Baran 291-92, 296 ) . On the other manus, it is really simple to distinguish what occurs in the advertizements to what takes topographic point in the existent universe and assume that ads portray a dolled-up, comfortable description of actuality. However, this does non state us about the constellation of the advertisement universe, which is how it is put together ( Goffman 22 ) . Vernon Fryburger states that? advertisement is non indifferent or nonsubjective with respect to the merchandise or service being advertised ; it is a particular advocate, trusting to environ its topic with a rosy aura of comeliness? ( 9 ) . Much has changed since Fryburger made this statement. Even in those times, advertisement was seen as being really biased and nonsubjective. There were concealed messages throughout many ads in that epoch, which is prevailing in advertizements yet today.

What can be done to forestall these feelings of insignificance? Ads as a whole can and should portray a more realistic show of work forces and adult females alternatively of a prevarication. Sending letters to ad bureaus and authorities functionaries, in add-on to boycotting certain merchandises of things that could perchance convey about these feelings, are merely a few suggestions that can be done to forestall this from go oning to other consumers. The best thing for consumers to make is to non be soundless about this job in our society, but to take a strong base in what they believe in. The truth of the affair is that material ownerships can non convey a individual felicity, love, credence, success, etc. The individual himself is entirely responsible for that, non advertizements. If people come to grips with this world alternatively of the? world? depicted in advertizements, life would be

Liechty 8

easier and happier for people, alternatively of feeling as if they have to populate up to the? criterion? set Forth by the advertisement industry.

Bibliography

Liechty 9

Baran, Stanley J. Introduction to Mass Communication: Media Literacy and Culture. 2001 Ed.

Mountain View, California: Mayfield, 1999-2000.

Bovee, Courtland L. , William F. Arens. Contemporary Ad. Third Ed.

Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1989.

Craig, Stephen R. ? Madison Avenue V. The Feminine Mystique: How the Ad Industry

Responded to the Onset of the Modern Women? s Movement. ? Internet, 1997. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.rtvf.unt.edu/people/craig/madave.htm.

Ellis, Kate. ? Fatal Attraction, or the Post-modern Prometheus. ? Journal of Sex Research,

February, 1990.

Fryburger, Vernon, editor. The New World of Advertising. Chicago: Crain Books, 1975.

Goffman, Erving. Gender Advertisements. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard U.P. , 1979.

Griffiths, Merris. ? Craig, R. Stephen ( 1992 ) : ? The Consequence of Television Day Part on Gender

Portrayals in Television Commercials: A Content Analysis. ? ? Internet, 2001. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.aber.ac.uk/education/Resdeg/merris09.html.

Kahle, Lynn R. , Larry Chiagouris, editors. Valuess, Lifestyles, and Psychographics. Mahwah,

New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.

Meyers, William. The Image-Makers: Power and Persuasion on Madison Avenue. New York:

The New York Times Book, 1984.

Moog, Carol, Ph. D. ? Are They Selling Her Lips? ? : Ad and Identity. New York:

William Morrow, 1990.

Percy, Larry, John R. Rossiter. Ad Scheme: A Communication Theory Approach.

New York: Praeger, 1980.

Post Author: admin