Quebec Issue Essay, Research Paper
The Canadian integrity crisis affecting Quebec has been a controversial
issue since before the country^s alliance. Surrounding the
apparently unsurpassable quandary of integrity there are three chief
obstructions. The important deficiency of action for Canada on the portion of
many francaphone Quebecois, prevents any profound fond regard to the
state on their behalf. A temper of intransigency on the portion of
Canadians outside Quebec serves to estrange and anger the persons
within the state. A sensed leading vacuity throughout Canada on
behalf of its citizens contributes to a widespread feeling of
hopelessness ( Reid, 1991 ) . The complexness of, and guess towards,
the Canadian integrity crisis masks the infallible truth that while
soon, there is no solution to the job there is some hope for
the hereafter. Within the state of Quebec there is a important deficiency
of nationalism or any existent fond regard for Canada. In 1995, The Angus
Reid Group asked a national sample of Canadians to depict how they
personally felt about Canada. Four options were given:
* I am strongly attached to Canada-I love the state and what it
bases for ;
* I am attached to Canada, but merely so long as it provides me with a
good criterion of life ;
* I am non attached to Canada and would prefer to see it divide up into
two or more states ; and
* I would prefer to see Canada mix with the United States.
( Reid, 1995 )
Outside of Quebec, there was grounds of a high degree of nationalism
with over 85 % of Canadians stating that they are profoundly attached to the
state and what it stands for. In the state of Quebec, merely
tierce of the population and merely 20 % of the francophones, displayed
this degree of fondness for Canada. While there is argument over the
cause for these statistics, some persons believed that the
statistics were as a consequence of lingering wounded pride because of the
failed Meech Lake agreement in 1991. Many Quebecois were insulted by the
manner that many Canadians outside of Quebec trivialized the state of affairs,
and the province^s demands. Others believe that this job is
indirectly the consequence of Canada^s functionary bilingual position. The
concluding behind this is that biligualism serves to flush further
alienate and distinguish the Gallic within the state. This poses a
hard riddle. Bilingualism can non be abolished because while it
serves to estrange, it is besides perceived! by the Gallic as continuing
their alone civilization and individuality. One hope is that through Canadian
media a new stronger more incorporate individuality can be achieved. Arguably,
the CBC is this best forum for this displacement in values because of its
position as a Canadian symbol. This construct is farther validated by
Gerard Veilleux, president of the CBC in 1996.
Today in Canada, no 1 is certain what values all Canadians do portion in
common. That uncertainness evidently makes it harder for the CBC to make
its occupation efficaciously. But I would besides reason that at a clip like this, a
strong CBC is even more indispensable than of all time, to help in redefining
and reconstructing the nation-to be one of the principal forums for this
national procedure of soul-searching and consensus-building. It is non
wholly impracticable to believe that the CBC has the possible to unify
Canada through its dedication to no peculiar state in Canada but
alternatively the full state. The deficiency of nationalism within Quebec is
straight reflected in the inflexibleness of Canadian citizens outside of
Quebec. Quebecois are farther alienated and exasperated by the temper of
intransigency on the portion of other Canadians. This desensitisation and
refusal to admit the badness of the issue at manus provokes
Quebec^s feelings of disregard. The Maclean^s 15th one-year canvass found that
in Quebec the ^percentage of respondents stating it is likely Quebec
will be a separate state within the following 50 years^ ( Macleans, 1998 )
was 56 % compared to that of 38 % in the remainder of Canada. This startling
statistics indicates an inability on the portion of the remainder of Canada to
acknowledge the earnestness to which Quebecois regard the issue. Their
inability to to the full admit the issue badly trivializes a cause
Quebecois deem most of import. Former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau
believed that a temper of intransigency ^provides small room to steer
between a individual fundamental law which would impact all Canadians every bit,
and the formation of a completely independent Quebec province with few
ties to the remainder of! Canada.^ . ( 1991 ) This intransigency is best
exemplified in the intervention by the remainder of Canada towards a proposal
by the Quebec Liberals in 1991, known as the Allaire Proposal. Allaire
suggested a displacement in some powers from the federal authorities to the
for such duties as: wellness, agribusiness, unemployment
insurance, energy, the environment, and linguistic communication among others. Allaire
besides suggested a sharing with the federal authorities of other powers
like, native personal businesss, justness, revenue enhancement and gross. Allaire was
instantly refuted as being excessively generous to the state of Quebec.
Many politicians and citizens spent small clip on the issue of Allaire
before repressing it. Although the full footings of Allaire could likely
ne’er have been agreed upon, it is non wholly impracticable to believe
that some via media could hold been reached. One which neither would
hold insulted the Quebecois nor left the remainder of! Canada feeling
violated. Surely what is most of import is non the concluding consequence of
such a proposal but alternatively the government^s intervention of it. This
construct is a cardinal determiner in the hereafter of Quebec as a portion of
Canada. If the remainder of Canada can happen a manner in the hereafter to demo more
regard to the Quebecois there could be a manner to amicably fulfill both
groups. One barrier that prevents this procedure from taking topographic point is the
manner with which most of Canada regards their leaders.
The sensed leading nothingness throughout Canada advances the prevailing
feeling of disheartenment. When those polled in the Maclean^s 15th
one-year canvass were asked, ^How satisfied [ they ] are with the occupation Prime
Minister Jean Chrtien is making? ^ ( 1998 ) , merely 7 % of Canadians were really
satisfied. As Canadians consider their potency and their hereafters,
there are many different waies unfastened to them- all of which appear
every bit hard. Without religion in their leaders, Canadians have
go immobilized while the remainder of the universe moves on. Canadians are
aware of this fact and it merely serves to put off them farther. It is
Canada^s leaders who are chiefly responsible for all aspects of
national integrity. Without effectual leaders who command the regard and
assurance of those whom they represent any efforts at happening a
solution will be ineffective. Few leaders are able to hold any national
consequence because they are merely seen as sermonizers of the prejudices which they
clasp. Richard G. Lipse! Y, a professor of Economicss at Simon Fraser
University, commented on this at the President^s 25th Anniversary
Lecture Series at the University:
What we need is a solon who can pass on to the people in a non
partizan mode that they have jobs, non merely on the budget but
besides on all of the other jobs [ national integrity ] that I have
discussed. We urgently need a leader non merely a consummate
politician. ( 1990 )
This is possibly the best solution to the inquiry of Canadian
leading, it is nevertheless excessively idealistic. The bulk of Canadians do
non experience that he/she is in any political place at this clip, and so
another unsurpassable job presents its ego. Canadian integrity is an
issue which, is most deserving of attending but which besides has no
present solution. The deficiency of fond regard and nationalism for Canada
within the state of Quebec prevents the Quebecois from holding any
affinity to a unified Canada. The temper of inflexibleness and
stubbornness outside of Quebec merely contributes to their feelings of
animus and disregard. Many Canadian citizens hold the belief that
there are no suited leaders within the state who hold the people^s
best involvements at bosom. It is possibly so unpleasant an thought that
politicians would instead debate, argue and ballad incrimination, instead than come
to footings with the fact that soon there is no solution to this
job. Change is the key to happening a solution. By reiterating the same
actions Canadians can non anticipate to acquire different consequences. As the
millenium attacks, Canadians can merely trust that by offering and
seeking new methods, the conditions needed for a solution to be found,
will show themselves!
Branswell, Brenda, ET all. Macleans: Countdown for Canada. November 30, 1998.
Branswell, Brenda. Macleans: High Stakes in Quebec. November 9, 1998.
Canadian Press. Toronto Star: What^ ? s up? November 24, 1998.
Canadian Press. Toronto Star: What^ ? s up? November 24, 1998.
Canadian Speeches/Issues. Vol.4, Num.1, March 1990.
Canadian Speeches/Issues. Vol.4, Num.2, April 1990.
Canadian Speeches/Issues. Vol.5, Num.1, Mach 1991.
Canadian Speeches/Issues. Vol.5, Num.2, April, 1991.
internet.elibrary.com Electronic Library.
Maclean^ ? s: 15th Annual Poll. December 28th, 1998.
McNicoll, Tracy. The Toronto Star: No flight from political relations for Quebec young person. November 24, 1998.
reuters.com Reuters Online.
statcan.com Statistics Canada Online.
Wilson-Smith, Anthony. Macleans: The Patriot Game. November 30, 1998.