Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

The 20 respondents were subjected into a study questionnaire that consists of 20 seven inquiries. The first portion is sing their personal information such as gender, current matrimonial position and others. The 2nd portion is sing their current wellness status every bit good as their twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours activities. The 3rd portion is sing their perceptual experience on Alzheimer ‘s disease and in conclusion, their feelings towards the disease.

The information gathered were subjected into the Cronbach ‘s Alpha ; Factor Analysis and One-Way Analysis of Variance ( ANOVA ) as agencies of analysis of informations. The research worker used the SPSS as the tool for the analysis of such.

Cronbach ‘s Alpha

Normally, the Cronbach ‘s Alpha dependability coefficient ranges between 0-1. However, there is no existent bound for the coefficient. The closer Cronbach ‘s alpha coefficient is to 1.0 the greater the internal consistence of the points in the graduated table. Based upon the expression _ = rk / [ 1 + ( k -1 ) R ] where K is the figure of points considered and R is the mean of the inter-item correlativities the size of alpha is determined by both the figure of points in the graduated table and the average inter-item correlativities. George and Mallery ( 2003 ) provide the undermentioned regulations of pollex: “ _ & gt ; .9 – Excellent, _ & gt ; .8 – Good, _ & gt ; .7 – Acceptable, _ & gt ; .6 – Questionable, _ & gt ; .5 – Poor, and_ & lt ; .5 – Unacceptable ” .

In the instance of the obtained informations, the dependability coefficient is.887 which indicates good dependability coefficient. While increasing the value of alpha is partly dependent upon the figure of points in the graduated table, it should be noted that this has decreasing returns. It should besides be noted that an alpha of.8 is likely a sensible end. It should besides be noted that while a high value for Cronbach ‘s alpha indicates good internal consistence of the points in the graduated table, it does non intend that the graduated table is unidimensional. The dimensionality of the graduated table can be computed utilizing the factor analysis which will be discussed in the following subdivision.

Factor Analysis

The method followed here was to first analyze the initial responses of the participants with a position to choosing a subset of features that might act upon farther responses. Then, study responses were analysed at the point degree, utilizing figures, tabular arraies, or text entirely, to supply a first feeling.

These point degree responses were scrutinised for underlying forms via factor analytic processs ( Note that all processs reported here utilise SPSS ) . A requirement for including an point was that responses were non excessively severely skewed ( i.e. , 90 % or more of responses clustered in individual cell ) and that more by and large, the degree of response to that point was non deficient ( & lt ; 15-20 % ) to destabilize analysis. The factors identified in this manner correspond to the primary subjects or latent variables to which letter writers seem to be reacting in footings of assorted related points.

The protocol adopted here for factor analysis was to utilize default scenes ab initio ( Principal Axis Factor – PAF ) and to revolve the matrix of burdens to obtain extraneous ( independent ) factors ( Varimax rotary motion ) . The premier end of factor analysis is to individuality simple ( points loadings & gt ; 0.30 on merely one factor ) that are explainable, presuming that points are factorable ( The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin step of trying adequateness trials whether the partial correlativities among variables are little. Bartlett ‘s trial of sphericalness trials whether the correlativity matrix is an individuality matrix, bespeaking that the factor theoretical account is inappropriate ) .

Once clearly defined and explainable factors had been identified ( Factor loadings = & gt ; .10 were illustrated via an included tabular array even though merely point burdens & gt ; 0.30 were considered relevant to factor burdens ) , and responses related to these factors were saved in the signifier of factor tonss. These Bartlett factor tonss are tantamount to sub-scale or scale tonss with agencies of nothing and standard divergences of one ( z-scores ) , and with participants credited with separate tonss in relation to each identified factor.

A Principal Axis Factor ( PAF ) with a Varimax ( extraneous ) rotary motion of 22 of the 24 Likert scale inquiries from this study questionnaire was conducted on informations gathered from 20 participants. An scrutiny of the Kaiser-Meyer Olkin step of trying adequateness suggested that the sample was factorable ( KMO=.698 ) .

One Way Anova

One – manner Analysis of Variance ( ANOVA ) is done with the dependant variable which is the groups perceptual experience and attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease as compared with the independent variables which are their gender, description/race, faith, current employment position, highest degree of instruction, and current matrimonial position.

Gender vs. the Perceptions and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive

Between Groups

1.152

1

1.152

6.806

.018

Within Groups

3.048

18

.169

Entire

4.200

19

Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishments

Between Groups

.010

1

.010

.041

.842

Within Groups

4.190

18

.233

Entire

4.200

19

more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult females

Between Groups

.060

1

.060

.290

.597

Within Groups

3.690

18

.205

Entire

3.750

19

Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of aging

Between Groups

.010

1

.010

.041

.842

Within Groups

4.190

18

.233

Entire

4.200

19

does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.193

1

.193

.797

.384

Within Groups

4.357

18

.242

Entire

4.550

19

patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

.193

1

.193

.797

.384

Within Groups

4.357

18

.242

Entire

4.550

19

kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.060

1

.060

.290

.597

Within Groups

3.690

18

.205

Entire

3.750

19

there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.117

1

.117

2.520

.130

Within Groups

.833

18

.046

Entire

.950

19

concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.402

1

.402

.170

.685

Within Groups

42.548

18

2.364

Entire

42.950

19

as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

1.260

1

1.260

.819

.377

Within Groups

27.690

18

1.538

Entire

28.950

19

no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

3.086

1

3.086

1.869

.188

Within Groups

29.714

18

1.651

Entire

32.800

19

I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friends

Between Groups

1.371

1

1.371

.900

.355

Within Groups

27.429

18

1.524

Entire

28.800

19

I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regard

Between Groups

.402

1

.402

.295

.594

Within Groups

24.548

18

1.364

Entire

24.950

19

people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelings

Between Groups

2.593

1

2.593

2.542

.128

Within Groups

18.357

18

1.020

Entire

20.950

19

I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have them

Between Groups

4.002

1

4.002

4.354

.051

Within Groups

16.548

18

.919

Entire

20.550

19

Table 1 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ gender into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.018 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.051 degree of significance.

Description/Race vs. the Perceptions and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive

Between Groups

.516

1

.516

2.520

.130

Within Groups

3.684

18

.205

Entire

4.200

19

Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishments

Between Groups

.095

1

.095

.415

.527

Within Groups

4.105

18

.228

Entire

4.200

19

more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult females

Between Groups

.592

1

.592

3.375

.083

Within Groups

3.158

18

.175

Entire

3.750

19

Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of aging

Between Groups

.095

1

.095

.415

.527

Within Groups

4.105

18

.228

Entire

4.200

19

does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.129

1

.129

.525

.478

Within Groups

4.421

18

.246

Entire

4.550

19

patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

.445

1

.445

1.950

.180

Within Groups

4.105

18

.228

Entire

4.550

19

kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.592

1

.592

3.375

.083

Within Groups

3.158

18

.175

Entire

3.750

19

there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.003

1

.003

.050

.826

Within Groups

.947

18

.053

Entire

.950

19

concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.950

1

.950

.407

.531

Within Groups

42.000

18

2.333

Entire

42.950

19

as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.213

1

.213

.134

.719

Within Groups

28.737

18

1.596

Entire

28.950

19

no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

2.695

1

2.695

1.611

.220

Within Groups

30.105

18

1.673

Entire

32.800

19

I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friends

Between Groups

6.063

1

6.063

4.800

.042

Within Groups

22.737

18

1.263

Entire

28.800

19

I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regard

Between Groups

1.161

1

1.161

.878

.361

Within Groups

23.789

18

1.322

Entire

24.950

19

people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelings

Between Groups

.213

1

.213

.185

.672

Within Groups

20.737

18

1.152

Entire

20.950

19

I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have them

Between Groups

.024

1

.024

.021

.887

Within Groups

20.526

18

1.140

Entire

20.550

19

Table 2 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ race description into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.130 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.887 degree of significance.

Religion vs. the Perceptions and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive

Between Groups

.725

3

.242

1.113

.373

Within Groups

3.475

16

.217

Entire

4.200

19

Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishments

Between Groups

1.425

3

.475

2.739

.078

Within Groups

2.775

16

.173

Entire

4.200

19

more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult females

Between Groups

.650

3

.217

1.118

.371

Within Groups

3.100

16

.194

Entire

3.750

19

Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of aging

Between Groups

.225

3

.075

.302

.824

Within Groups

3.975

16

.248

Entire

4.200

19

does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.275

3

.092

.343

.795

Within Groups

4.275

16

.267

Entire

4.550

19

patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

.575

3

.192

.771

.527

Within Groups

3.975

16

.248

Entire

4.550

19

kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.650

3

.217

1.118

.371

Within Groups

3.100

16

.194

Entire

3.750

19

there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.075

3

.025

.457

.716

Within Groups

.875

16

.055

Entire

.950

19

concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

7.050

3

2.350

1.047

.399

Within Groups

35.900

16

2.244

Entire

42.950

19

as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

3.850

3

1.283

.818

.503

Within Groups

25.100

16

1.569

Entire

28.950

19

no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

3.425

3

1.142

.622

.611

Within Groups

29.375

16

1.836

Entire

32.800

19

I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friends

Between Groups

9.525

3

3.175

2.636

.085

Within Groups

19.275

16

1.205

Entire

28.800

19

I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regard

Between Groups

4.675

3

1.558

1.230

.331

Within Groups

20.275

16

1.267

Entire

24.950

19

people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelings

Between Groups

.675

3

.225

.178

.910

Within Groups

20.275

16

1.267

Entire

20.950

19

I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have them

Between Groups

2.150

3

.717

.623

.610

Within Groups

18.400

16

1.150

Entire

20.550

19

Table 3 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ faith into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.373 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.610 degree of significance.

Current Employment Status vs. the Perception and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive

Between Groups

.763

3

.254

1.183

.347

Within Groups

3.438

16

.215

Entire

4.200

19

Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishments

Between Groups

1.200

3

.400

2.133

.136

Within Groups

3.000

16

.188

Entire

4.200

19

more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult females

Between Groups

.313

3

.104

.485

.698

Within Groups

3.438

16

.215

Entire

3.750

19

Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of aging

Between Groups

1.200

3

.400

2.133

.136

Within Groups

3.000

16

.188

Entire

4.200

19

does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.800

3

.267

1.138

.364

Within Groups

3.750

16

.234

Entire

4.550

19

patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

.800

3

.267

1.138

.364

Within Groups

3.750

16

.234

Entire

4.550

19

kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.750

3

.250

1.333

.299

Within Groups

3.000

16

.188

Entire

3.750

19

there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.950

3

.317

.

.

Within Groups

.000

16

.000

Entire

.950

19

concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

9.450

3

3.150

1.504

.251

Within Groups

33.500

16

2.094

Entire

42.950

19

as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.700

3

.233

.132

.940

Within Groups

28.250

16

1.766

Entire

28.950

19

no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

2.863

3

.954

.510

.681

Within Groups

29.938

16

1.871

Entire

32.800

19

I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friends

Between Groups

5.800

3

1.933

1.345

.295

Within Groups

23.000

16

1.438

Entire

28.800

19

I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regard

Between Groups

3.200

3

1.067

.785

.520

Within Groups

21.750

16

1.359

Entire

24.950

19

people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelings

Between Groups

.700

3

.233

.184

.905

Within Groups

20.250

16

1.266

Entire

20.950

19

I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have them

Between Groups

4.113

3

1.371

1.334

.298

Within Groups

16.438

16

1.027

Entire

20.550

19

Table 4 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ current employment into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.347 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.298 degree of significance.

Highest Level of Education vs. the Perception and Attitudes

Analysis of variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive

Between Groups

.843

4

.211

.941

.467

Within Groups

3.357

15

.224

Entire

4.200

19

Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishments

Between Groups

.843

4

.211

.941

.467

Within Groups

3.357

15

.224

Entire

4.200

19

more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult females

Between Groups

.560

4

.140

.658

.631

Within Groups

3.190

15

.213

Entire

3.750

19

Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of aging

Between Groups

.843

4

.211

.941

.467

Within Groups

3.357

15

.224

Entire

4.200

19

does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

1.002

4

.251

1.060

.410

Within Groups

3.548

15

.237

Entire

4.550

19

patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

.752

4

.188

.743

.577

Within Groups

3.798

15

.253

Entire

4.550

19

kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.821

4

.205

1.052

.414

Within Groups

2.929

15

.195

Entire

3.750

19

there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.117

4

.029

.525

.719

Within Groups

.833

15

.056

Entire

.950

19

concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

13.402

4

3.351

1.701

.202

Within Groups

29.548

15

1.970

Entire

42.950

19

as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

9.021

4

2.255

1.698

.203

Within Groups

19.929

15

1.329

Entire

28.950

19

no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

3.788

4

.947

.490

.743

Within Groups

29.012

15

1.934

Entire

32.800

19

I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friends

Between Groups

5.110

4

1.277

.809

.539

Within Groups

23.690

15

1.579

Entire

28.800

19

I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regard

Between Groups

2.200

4

.550

.363

.831

Within Groups

22.750

15

1.517

Entire

24.950

19

people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelings

Between Groups

5.117

4

1.279

1.212

.347

Within Groups

15.833

15

1.056

Entire

20.950

19

I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have them

Between Groups

6.288

4

1.572

1.653

.213

Within Groups

14.262

15

.951

Entire

20.550

19

Table 4 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ highest degree of instruction into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.467 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.213 degree of significance.

Current Marital Status vs. the Perception and Attitude

Table 4 shows the consequences for the ANOVA comparing the respondents ‘ current matrimonial position into their attitudes towards Alzheimer ‘s disease. On the inquiry whether Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive, it has.116 degree of significance while the inquiry whether they think that if they can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being about people that have them indicates.633 degree of significance.

Analysis of variance

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Alzheimer ‘s disease is progressive

Between Groups

1.561

4

.390

2.218

.116

Within Groups

2.639

15

.176

Entire

4.200

19

Alzheimer ‘s disease destroy memory and thought accomplishments

Between Groups

1.311

4

.328

1.702

.202

Within Groups

2.889

15

.193

Entire

4.200

19

more work forces get Alzheimer ‘s than adult females

Between Groups

.444

4

.111

.504

.733

Within Groups

3.306

15

.220

Entire

3.750

19

Alzheimer ‘s is a normal portion of aging

Between Groups

1.811

4

.453

2.843

.061

Within Groups

2.389

15

.159

Entire

4.200

19

does n’t cognize what starts Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

1.244

4

.311

1.412

.278

Within Groups

3.306

15

.220

Entire

4.550

19

patterns that can cut down the hazard of Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

1.800

4

.450

2.455

.091

Within Groups

2.750

15

.183

Entire

4.550

19

kids can acquire Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.694

4

.174

.852

.514

Within Groups

3.056

15

.204

Entire

3.750

19

there is a remedy for Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

.200

4

.050

1.000

.438

Within Groups

.750

15

.050

Entire

.950

19

concern about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

4.950

4

1.238

.488

.744

Within Groups

38.000

15

2.533

Entire

42.950

19

as I get older, I worry more about acquiring Alzheimer ‘s disease

Between Groups

6.644

4

1.661

1.117

.385

Within Groups

22.306

15

1.487

Entire

28.950

19

no 1 will take attention of me if I get Alzheimer ‘s

Between Groups

.994

4

.249

.117

.974

Within Groups

31.806

15

2.120

Entire

32.800

19

I feel comfy speaking Alzheimer ‘s with household and friends

Between Groups

8.744

4

2.186

1.635

.217

Within Groups

20.056

15

1.337

Entire

28.800

19

I feel people with ALzheimer ‘s are treated without regard

Between Groups

2.700

4

.675

.455

.767

Within Groups

22.250

15

1.483

Entire

24.950

19

people with Alzheimer ‘s have no feelings

Between Groups

4.728

4

1.182

1.093

.395

Within Groups

16.222

15

1.081

Entire

20.950

19

I can acquire Alzheimer ‘s by being around with people that have them

Between Groups

3.050

4

.763

.654

.633

Within Groups

17.500

15

1.167

Entire

20.550

19

Discussion

Based on the consequences of the study, bulk of the respondents have a positive attitude and perceptual experience toward the construct of Alzheimer ‘s. Though the respondents ‘ cognition sing the disease is undeniably limited.

As a portion of the statistical analysis, the non-parametric Spearman rho analysis was besides conducted. The nonparametric Spearman ‘s rho trial was chosen because it is appropriate for the ordinal informations used in the tools. It is utile in finding relationships among nonparametric informations where the premises of the Pearson correlativity are violated. The Spearman ‘s rho trial revealed some of import, but non surprising relationships. The most important relationships, based on a 0.01 degree ( 2-tailed ) , were between the gender highest educational attainment of the respondents and their attitude and perceptual experience towards the disease. There were strong correlativities between the cognition in the patterned advance of the disease, and the cognition in the ability of AD in destructing the memory and believing accomplishments of single

The Spearman ‘s rho, based on a 0.05 degree ( 2-tailed ) nevertheless did non uncover any important relationship or correlativity between the respondents ‘ personal information and their attitude and perceptual experience towards the Alzheimer ‘s disease.

Post Author: admin