Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Management Essay, Research Paper

.I have spent the first half of this semester analyzing the historical fiction of ancient civilizations, more specifically, the book Genesis, the heroic poem of Gilgamesh, and the Enuma Elish creative activity narrative. It was interesting to detect the singularity and at the same clip, the similarities of the narratives. Many of the inside informations in the narratives were similar, yet some facets were different. For the intent of this paper it is of import to observe the significance of what changes the writer ( s ) of Genesis made and inquire what the writer? s motivations might hold been in altering some parts and maintaining others the same. First, I will analyze the Creation of the Universe, comparing the versions given in Genesis to the version given in the narrative of the Enuma Elish. In both Genesis and in the Enuma Elish the Universe was created by a higher power that had the ability to do order out of pandemonium. Both narratives attemp to reply the really hard inquiry of how life began. Possibly this was an effort by the writers to give their audience some comfort and stableness. This inquiry is after all, one that everyone would wish to cognize the reply to, right?

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The method by which the existence was created does differ rather a spot in each narrative. The Bible assures us that God has the eldritch ability to do something out of nil and so do it into something else. Marduk, Godhead of the existence in the Enuma Elish, can non carry through this as he must foremost hold the stuffs, those being to be the organic structure of Tiamat. In the Enuma Elish, creative activity of the existence is violently portrayed as Marduk must capture, so kill Tiamat and salve the cadaver in order to construct the universe harmonizing to the will of the Gods. Harmonizing to the Bible God entirely created the universe out of love. This is a major difference because it changes the nature of the existence. In a existence created out of force, force could be tolerated or accepted because it would look natural. In a existence created out of love force will non be accepted as something that occurs of course, since force was non a factor in its creative activity. The writer of Genesis likely did non like violent Acts of the Apostless hence he eliminated them from his version of how the existence came to be.

Another major difference that I notice in the two narratives is the? theisms? . Genesis gives us a Universe with one God, Monotheism. The Enuma Elish paints a polytheistic portrayal of the Universe. The God of Genesis is to the full in control of everything that occurs in the Universe. This simplifies things so worlds have merely one God to thank, fault, fright, etc. Believers of the Enuma Elish creative activity narrative have to larn about all sorts of Gods and godesses who have limited duties. For illustration, Ea is the God of wisdom and that is his exclusive duty. I think this is the most of import difference between the Ancient Israelite divinity and the divinities of the surrounding civilizations.

While analyzing the narratives of creative activity presented in Genesis and in the heroic poem of Gilgamesh, I drew the decision that the narratives are really similar because they express the same sentiments of truths about mundane aspects of human life. Sexuality is the subject covered in these parts of the narrative. An illustration of this would be the comparing of the sexual Acts of the Apostless of Adam and Eve to those of Gilgamesh. Both narratives are of male and female company and sexual behaviour. Genesis? s writer is connoting that sexual behaviour strips us of an artlessness and replaces it with cognition. This cognition is non needfully a bad thing because along with it comes freedom to take. Gilgamesh? s narrative implies that sexual behaviour is a violent act that consequences in the Gods losing favour of Gilgamesh ( This occurs in Genesis when Adam and Eve disobey God ) . Enkidu is so born in hopes that he might get the better of Gilgamesh. Enkidu? s foremost sexual experience causes him to lose touch with the animate beings in the wood, but gain cognition of himself. This resembles the narrative of Genesis when Adam and Eve realize their nakedness.

The biggest similarity that I found in comparing the inundation narratives of Gilgamesh and Genesis was that the motivation behind both inundations was the desire of the God or Gods to destruct what had been created because of their letdown in what it had become. The flood narrative of Gilgamesh besides portions many similarities with the narrative of Adam and Eve that is found in Genesis. In both instances the animals ( Gilgamesh, Adam, and Eve ) want to go like the Gods that they know. Greed kills. This is the message in both of the narratives, although the minor inside informations of the narrative are different the moral is the same.

What makes the beliefs given in Genesis so alone when compared to the beliefs found in the Enuma Elish and the heroic poem of Gilgamesh? The simple fact that most people find it more soothing does non reply the inquiry but it explains the utmost popularity of the divinity. Monotheism is a characteristic that was alone to Israelite divinity, this makes it easier to idolize and since there is merely one God to worry approximately, it is easier to maintain in God? s favour.

The humanistic facet of the literature is something that could non be found in either of the other narratives. The narratives in Genesis are more about worlds acting like worlds. Cain kills his brother out of green-eyed monster, which is a basic human emotion. There is besides no reference of? unnatural? animals one-third human, two? 3rd animal like that found in Gilgamesh.To me at least, Genesis seems like it would appeal to people who wanted to understand the universe in which they live.

I think that Ancient Israelite divinity offers a position of the universe that is more organized and simplified than the positions given in the other texts. One God as opposed to many, with control over everything that can perchance impact humanity. The absolute power of Genesis? s God is a the most of import difference to observe because it is something that can non be found inside the other two narrations. The Gods found in all old divinities had to portion power. One God of Ancient Israel has no challenge to his authorization, no resistance to his regulation. The writer ( s ) of Genesis made it possible for worlds to see God as their male monarch, and the existence as the land, and themselves a

s the retainers.

.I have spent the first half of this semester analyzing the historical fiction of ancient civilizations, more specifically, the book Genesis, the heroic poem of Gilgamesh, and the Enuma Elish creative activity narrative. It was interesting to detect the singularity and at the same clip, the similarities of the narratives. Many of the inside informations in the narratives were similar, yet some facets were different. For the intent of this paper it is of import to observe the significance of what changes the writer ( s ) of Genesis made and inquire what the writer? s motivations might hold been in altering some parts and maintaining others the same. First, I will analyze the Creation of the Universe, comparing the versions given in Genesis to the version given in the narrative of the Enuma Elish. In both Genesis and in the Enuma Elish the Universe was created by a higher power that had the ability to do order out of pandemonium. Both narratives attemp to reply the really hard inquiry of how life began. Possibly this was an effort by the writers to give their audience some comfort and stableness. This inquiry is after all, one that everyone would wish to cognize the reply to, right?

The method by which the existence was created does differ rather a spot in each narrative. The Bible assures us that God has the eldritch ability to do something out of nil and so do it into something else. Marduk, Godhead of the existence in the Enuma Elish, can non carry through this as he must foremost hold the stuffs, those being to be the organic structure of Tiamat. In the Enuma Elish, creative activity of the existence is violently portrayed as Marduk must capture, so kill Tiamat and salve the cadaver in order to construct the universe harmonizing to the will of the Gods. Harmonizing to the Bible God entirely created the universe out of love. This is a major difference because it changes the nature of the existence. In a existence created out of force, force could be tolerated or accepted because it would look natural. In a existence created out of love force will non be accepted as something that occurs of course, since force was non a factor in its creative activity. The writer of Genesis likely did non like violent Acts of the Apostless hence he eliminated them from his version of how the existence came to be.

Another major difference that I notice in the two narratives is the? theisms? . Genesis gives us a Universe with one God, Monotheism. The Enuma Elish paints a polytheistic portrayal of the Universe. The God of Genesis is to the full in control of everything that occurs in the Universe. This simplifies things so worlds have merely one God to thank, fault, fright, etc. Believers of the Enuma Elish creative activity narrative have to larn about all sorts of Gods and godesses who have limited duties. For illustration, Ea is the God of wisdom and that is his exclusive duty. I think this is the most of import difference between the Ancient Israelite divinity and the divinities of the surrounding civilizations.

While analyzing the narratives of creative activity presented in Genesis and in the heroic poem of Gilgamesh, I drew the decision that the narratives are really similar because they express the same sentiments of truths about mundane aspects of human life. Sexuality is the subject covered in these parts of the narrative. An illustration of this would be the comparing of the sexual Acts of the Apostless of Adam and Eve to those of Gilgamesh. Both narratives are of male and female company and sexual behaviour. Genesis? s writer is connoting that sexual behaviour strips us of an artlessness and replaces it with cognition. This cognition is non needfully a bad thing because along with it comes freedom to take. Gilgamesh? s narrative implies that sexual behaviour is a violent act that consequences in the Gods losing favour of Gilgamesh ( This occurs in Genesis when Adam and Eve disobey God ) . Enkidu is so born in hopes that he might get the better of Gilgamesh. Enkidu? s foremost sexual experience causes him to lose touch with the animate beings in the wood, but gain cognition of himself. This resembles the narrative of Genesis when Adam and Eve realize their nakedness.

The biggest similarity that I found in comparing the inundation narratives of Gilgamesh and Genesis was that the motivation behind both inundations was the desire of the God or Gods to destruct what had been created because of their letdown in what it had become. The flood narrative of Gilgamesh besides portions many similarities with the narrative of Adam and Eve that is found in Genesis. In both instances the animals ( Gilgamesh, Adam, and Eve ) want to go like the Gods that they know. Greed kills. This is the message in both of the narratives, although the minor inside informations of the narrative are different the moral is the same.

What makes the beliefs given in Genesis so alone when compared to the beliefs found in the Enuma Elish and the heroic poem of Gilgamesh? The simple fact that most people find it more soothing does non reply the inquiry but it explains the utmost popularity of the divinity. Monotheism is a characteristic that was alone to Israelite divinity, this makes it easier to idolize and since there is merely one God to worry approximately, it is easier to maintain in God? s favour.

The humanistic facet of the literature is something that could non be found in either of the other narratives. The narratives in Genesis are more about worlds acting like worlds. Cain kills his brother out of green-eyed monster, which is a basic human emotion. There is besides no reference of? unnatural? animals one-third human, two? 3rd animal like that found in Gilgamesh.To me at least, Genesis seems like it would appeal to people who wanted to understand the universe in which they live.

I think that Ancient Israelite divinity offers a position of the universe that is more organized and simplified than the positions given in the other texts. One God as opposed to many, with control over everything that can perchance impact humanity. The absolute power of Genesis? s God is a the most of import difference to observe because it is something that can non be found inside the other two narrations. The Gods found in all old divinities had to portion power. One God of Ancient Israel has no challenge to his authorization, no resistance to his regulation. The writer ( s ) of Genesis made it possible for worlds to see God as their male monarch, and the existence as the land, and themselves as the retainers.

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Gloria!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out