Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Macbeth Guilt Essay, Research Paper

This was an unwritten presentation, in which I prosecuted Macbeth. I received a class

of A- , nevertheless was told that it was my existent presentation instead than my essay

that stopped me acquiring a higher class Ladies and Gentlemen, I will be brief.

You have heard the testimonies and seen the grounds ; it is now clip for the

destiny of Macbeth to be decided. Today you have met tonss of informants testify,

under curse, the suspect? s wholly good and honest character, and have

pondered as to how the King of Scotland could perpetrate such atrociousnesss. However,

unmistakable grounds opposes such testimonies and proves beyond sensible

uncertainty that the suspect Macbeth killed his King, Duncan the II of Scotland, his

life-long friend Banquo and Lady Macduff and her kids. Over the last six

months we have seen Macbeth degrade from a fearless and heroic warrior to a

liquidator, a witting scoundrel who felt utmost guilt after killing his King out

of pure greed and aspiration. His retainer, as testified, overheard Macbeth express

his guilt to his married woman on the dark of the slaying: ? I am afraid to believe what I

hold done ; Look on? T once more I dare not. ? Following his coronating at Scone,

King Macbeth hired three bravos to slay his long-time friend Banquo, in

order to protect his Crown. It was after the slaying of Banquo that Macbeth so

turned into an merciless, non-repentant autocrat. This adult male, one time heralded a hero,

became the curse of Scotland and his people. The defence has tried to pull strings

facts to carry you that Macbeth is non to fault for these slayings and has

placed duty for these deceases on everyone from Lady Macbeth to the

enchantresss, who on occasion conversed with the accused. You have heard testimonies

of the three enchantresss, who told us of their brushs with Macbeth. What kind of

adult male would tie in with such evil existences, and most of all, believe the bunk

they foresee? The enchantresss did non straight act upon Macbeth to assassinate his

King, they merely speculated as to what the hereafter may keep and these anticipations

ignited his overpowering aspiration to go King. These associations with the

enchantresss bring serious uncertainties to the goodness of the suspect? s character.

Guesss that Lady Macbeth is responsible for Duncan? s slaying have been

made by the defence. But blood found on this cloak hidden in Macbeth? s

quarters proves without uncertainty that it was Macbeth who really committed the

slaying. He is finally to fault. The accusals made by Macbeth? s attorneies

that Lady Macbeth pressured her hubby to assassinate Duncan are irrelevant. It

is unthinkable that such a brave and valiant soldier could be so weak as to be

influenced by his married woman to perpetrate slaying, unless he had already considered making

it, or had something to derive from the decease of Duncan, such as the throne of

Scotland. The defence has tried to convert you that Macbeth was insane at the

clip of King Duncan? s slaying. If he were non sane, would he hold been seen as

such a well-loved and brave soldier? Would he hold been so respected by his

King to be honoured with the rubric of Thane of Cawdor, had he been badly at head?

These impressions themselves are insane! Macbeth was sane and rational at the clip

of the slaying! ? Yes, Macbeth did demo marks of mental unsoundness a hebdomad after the

slaying at the feast, as testified by Ross, who attended the banquet and

described to you the accused? s unusual behavior. Could an guiltless adult male be

driven mad over a period of a hebdomad? It was his scruples, my friends, which

drove him insane! After the pre-meditated slayings of Duncan and Banquo, the

force per unit areas of being King, and the mounting guilt of the slayings he had committed,

were increasing. Overheard by his retainer, Macbeth said to his married woman? I am in

blood, Stepp? vitamin D in so far? ? The mercantile establishment for his fury was Lady Macduff and

her household. This pointless, and motiveless, slaughter shows the inhuman treatment and

immorality that has become a portion of Macbeth. He did non stand to derive anything

from the deceases of these guiltless people. No longer was he the honoured soldier,

or the compassionate King, but the barbarous autocrat. We must halt devising alibis

for this cold-hearted adult male. He was non influenced by his married woman or witchery. He

was sane when he viciously murdered his King. He was influenced merely by his

aspiration and greed to go King ; he was influenced by his selfishness and

hungriness for power. From hero to heartless autocrat, this is the calamity of Macbeth.

Ladies and Gentlemen, his clip has come. Macbeth? s destiny lies in your custodies. I

trust that you will do the right judgement.

Post Author: admin