The Meaning of the Congo River for Marlow. the journey on the Congo River is one of the most hard and baleful journeys he will of all time take. The fact that it takes him about and non wholly into the jungle is important of Marlow’s psychological journey as good. He ne’er truly goes on land but watches the shore from the exterior. The lone clip he goes on shore he finds a barren. For Marlow the jungle of the Congo is representative of immorality that adult male is capable of. In Heart of Darkness. it seems that the farther Marlow travels into the jungle. the deeper he looks into himself. All this clip is spent on the Congo River as he looks from the exterior. This is symbolic as he is looking at his psyche from the outside but ne’er truly sees himself until he goes on land to acquire Kurtz. When he arrives on land is symbolic of when he looks the deepest into himself. He goes to happen Kurtz on his deathbed and is given he pick to take over for him as a God among an African folk.
Marlow is faced with the ultimate pick between good and evil. For a minute it is unsure what pick Marlow will do. But. unlike Kurtz. Marlow picks the good over evil. as he rescues Kurtz back to the soft-shell clam. The fact that Marlow sailed along the Congo River. around the jungle. and non really into the jungle is an of import symbol besides. Marlow ne’er walks the way that Kurtz did to suicide. He went around the jungle to avoid acquiring captured by immorality. Kurtz was a nice Englishman until he gave into the desires of his bosom of darkness. Kurtz spent all his clip in the jungle and finally forgot all of his self-denial. manners. and upbringing. He genuinely looked in the deepest portion of himself and found that his evil desires would reign. This is symbolic because he was deep inside the jungle. In this regard Conrad uses to work forces to demo the reader both the good and bad of world.
He shows the true immorality and good that adult male is capable of If proper restraints had been at that place would Kurtz hold done things otherwise? The fact that no 1 was around to maintain Kurtz in cheque helped him win in going capable of the huge immorality he became. Marlow had his shipmates at that place to maintain him responsible. When he left the steamboat at that place wasn’t anyone to keep Marlow. He was face to face with himself and his human desires. but as he looked at Kurtz and what the immorality had done to him he saw the effects of taking immorality. If Marlow hadn’t seen the effects would he hold acted otherwise? In the beginning of the novel. Marlow negotiations of things as if they are go oning far off from him and non really go oning close by which represents that he is on the outside looking in.
He besides talks about a fog that settles over the river. This fog represents a deformation of what lies in front. As he makes his determinations based on what he thinks is right but truly he has no thought of what will go on to him or his crew. As the novel progresses the reader will get down to understand all of these subjects and symbols that the Congo River represents. It represents the sloughing of beds of the psyche and taking a expression into the desires of the bosom. By the terminal it seams as though the reader has taken a expression into their ain psyche to happen out what finally dominates them. Will they find themselves to be a Marlow ; a individual who exercises their capacity for good. or will they happen themselves to be a Kurtz ; a individual capable of an huge bosom of darkness?