Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Child Law Uk Essay, Research Paper

In this essay, I refer to the words Power and Duty. The word power in legal footings is the ability to make or move, which implies a pick. Duty is an duty ; something that jurisprudence binds me to make. This essay is written in reply to a instance survey, which examines a state of affairs, which focuses on the Children Act of 1989. This act was composed to protect the public assistance of all kids, whatever their fortunes and backgrounds.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

& # 8220 ; An Act to reform the jurisprudence associating to kids ; to supply for local authorization services for kids in demand and others ; to amend the jurisprudence with regard to kids & # 8217 ; s places, community places, voluntary places and voluntary administrations ; to do proviso with regard to fosterage, kid minding and twenty-four hours attention for immature kids and acceptance ; and for connected purposes. & # 8221 ;

In this essay I am presuming the function of the societal worker. In this instance Peter and Jane have a babe boy called David, who is about four months old. It says in subdivision 2 ( 1 ) , that where the kid & # 8217 ; s parents have been married before the construct of the kid, they shall each hold parental duty for the kid, the significance of parental duty is discussed in subdivision 3. In this instance, both Peter and Jane were married at David & # 8217 ; s birth. Jane bought David in to hospital with a terrible caput hurt. Upon scrutiny by the hospital staff he is found to besides hold suffered old hurt to some of his ribs. This has caused grave concern and given rise to the infirmary advising the constabulary. They in bend have gone on to advise the local authorization, which has appointed me as David & # 8217 ; s societal worker. Under subdivision 47 I have a responsibility to look into the allegations and besides a responsibility to reach all other bureaus who might be involved with Peter, Jane and David, in conformity with subdivision 47 ( 9 to 11 ) Since the information given is still lone allegations ( a intuition ) , I have to roll up some grounds, non needfully to utilize to prosecute Peter and Jane, but to advance David & # 8217 ; s criterion of life. However I should non allow Parent / societal worker communications via media or impede the wellness or public assistance of David and when reading subdivision 1, for the word & # 8216 ; tribunal & # 8217 ; I should subsidize the word & # 8216 ; societal worker & # 8217 ; , or any other bureau who has traffics with the kid. My first inquiry would be, is David a kid in demand, subdivision 17, or at hazard of important injury due to the quality of parental attention, this would promote me to raise a supervising order [ subdivision 31 ( 2,9 & A ; 10 ) ] . The supervising order can last ab initio for one twelvemonth, but can be extended in length for up to a sum of three old ages [ agenda 3 ( 6 ) ] . If he were a kid in demand, so I would hold to be of agenda 2 ( 1 ) , which directs me to set up the proviso of services to the household and identifies a kid in demand. If there has been a interruption down in his attention, as at that place seems to be in this instance, so under subdivision 17 ( 1 ) , the local authorization have a responsibility to advance the public assistance and the safeguarding of the kid. Besides as a representative of the local governments I would hold a general responsibility to forestall the agony of the kid from disregard, by the proviso of necessary services, this could include advice to the parents, Peter and Jane. If the kid, David is at hazard of important injury and there is a sense of exigency about the state of affairs, so the kid can be placed under an EPO ( Emergency protection order ) [ subdivision 44 ] . This removes the kid from the household place and is active for eight yearss. It can be extended for another seven yearss. At this point, although the kid has been taken off from the attacker and the individual who applied for the EPO has certain parental duties, the parents have non lost all their rights to parental duty. The power of the EPO is merely available if the kid is at hazard and non for a kid who is within a safe environment. If on the other manus the instance presents itself as a non-emergency instance, so the following action depends upon the cooperation of the parents, Peter and Jane. If they do collaborate so it is a simple instance of go oning the probe [ subdivision 47 ] . However, if the parents are clogging, so a CAO ( Child Assessment Order ) [ subdivision 43 ] demands to be obtained. This is an enquiry into the development and wellness of the kid and may besides give rise to the enforcement of an EPO. This has immediate consequence and lasts for a period of up to seven yearss, it can non be renewed for six months unless the tribunal agrees subdivision 43 ( 5 ) . In conformity with subdivision 43 ( 6 ) ( a and B ) , David would so hav

vitamin E to be produced to me to measure as I think fit, to follow with the tribunal order. Section 43 ( 4 ) says that I can non use for a CAO if David is in an exigency state of affairs. If the parents still continue to be clogging, I would hold to obtain police aid [ subdivision 46 ] to procure David’s safety and later be able to transport out my probe without hinderance. Section 17 of PACE ( constabulary and condemnable act ) of 1984 gives the constabulary the power to come in edifices if they believe that person is at hazard. A police officer, under subdivision 46 of PACE, can besides take a kid if he has sensible cause to believe that the kid is at hazard of important injury and take it to such a topographic point where it is safe. This has a life span of 72 hours, after which an EPO can be obtained. In conformity with subdivision 43 ( 9 ) , I can merely maintain the kid off from place if it necessary for the intents of appraisal. As another option, David could besides be placed in the attention of his grandparents, because under subdivision 17 ( 1 ) ( B ) , it is advised that I accommodate him with members of his household [ subdivision 23 ] , besides subdivision 17 ( 3 ) provides the services necessary to care for David in that environment. If this is non possible due to some signifier of bar, in subdivision 20 ( 1 ) the local authorization has a responsibility to suit David in a lovingness society, which is close to his place. Besides the local authorization have to give due consideration to the David’s faith, race, cultural background and lingual nurturing. If a attention order is taken out, the parental duty is given to the local governments, intending that a supervisor or responsible grownup, under subdivision 5, would be enrolled to befriend the kid. Under subdivision 2 ( 5 and 6 ) , this does non take the rights of the Peter and Jane with respects to parental duty ; it merely means that the local authorization has the determinant ballot. Although this might be the instance, under subdivision 34 and subdivision 8, the local authorization must let David sensible contact with his parents or defender. The lone fluctuation to this opinion is that the local authorization has the right to deny contact for seven yearss, under subdivision 34 ( 6 ) , if they believe that the kid is at hazard and if it would dispute David’s public assistance. If a attention order were raised, under subdivision 33, the local authorization would hold to have David into their attention and maintain him at that place whilst the order was in topographic point. Should David travel in to further attention, the local governments have to be cognizant of agenda 2 ( 2 ) , which lays out the ordinances about where the kid, David, can be placed. They would besides hold to be cognizant of subdivision 22, which lays out the responsibility of the local authorization, in relation to the kids that they are looking after. This would last until David was 18 old ages old unless under subdivision 91 ( 12 ) , it is bought to an earlier terminal.

At the terminal of all this, if Peter and Jane feel that they have been unjustly represented, under subdivision 94, they can appeal to the High Court. Obviously this does non intend that the whole instance will be reverted, but they may hold conclusive grounds that has been over looked. As the kid & # 8217 ; s societal worker, I would trust that at the terminal of the proceedings that there was a happy stoping for all of the people concerned, but it would still hold to be David & # 8217 ; s involvements that would come foremost.

( 1485 words )

Bibliography

N.Gravells. Family Law Statutes ( 5th Ed ) . Sweet & A ; Maxwell Ltd. London. 1992

M.Hayes, C.Williams. Family Law. Principles, Policy and Practice. Butterworths. London. 1995

M.Oldham.Statutes on Family Law 2000 to 2001 ( 9th Ed ) . Blackstone Press Ltd. London. 2000

H.Brayne, G.Martin. Law for Social Workers ( 6th Ed ) . Blackstone Press Ltd. London. 1999.

M.Davies. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Work. Blackwell Publishers. Oxford. 2000

M.Thomas, J.Pierson. Dictionary of Social work. Collins Educational. London. 1999

N.Gravells. Family Law Statutes ( 5th Ed ) . Sweet & A ; Maxwell Ltd. London. 1992

M.Hayes, C.Williams. Family Law. Principles, Policy and Practice. Butterworths. London. 1995

M.Oldham.Statutes on Family Law 2000 to 2001 ( 9th Ed ) . Blackstone Press Ltd. London. 2000

H.Brayne, G.Martin. Law for Social Workers ( 6th Ed ) . Blackstone Press Ltd. London. 1999.

M.Davies. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Work. Blackwell Publishers. Oxford. 2000

M.Thomas, J.Pierson. Dictionary of Social work. Collins Educational. London. 1999

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Gloria!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out